Best way to close your Postfinance account (as told by an Postfinance Employee):
- Login to E-Finance
- Change to «Kontakt / Mailbox» (check image below)
- Goto «Kontakt» > «Neue Nachricht»
- Write them a letter that you want to close your account.
- Log out. Done ;)
(For al larger version click on the picture)
(For al larger version click on the picture)
CUBE: There is no conspiracy, nobody is in charge…
One of the best movie-scenes ever…
Watch it here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XY_5jv-80gA&feature=related
Best Hoop Dancing Video outta there. She's drawing you into the flow, if you want or not... Watch it:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gRRHajaLNRg
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gRRHajaLNRg
Tongue Forest Ft. Lamont Humphrey - And You Got The F...... Nerve To Call Me Coloured?
Wer kennt den Autor dieses Cartoons?
Wer kennt den Autor dieses Cartoons?
Following is an open letter by Josh Stieber, former specialist, U.S. Army and
Ethan McCord, former specialist, U.S. Army, that they published here.
In the name of humanity, go and sign the following petition. Now.
(Following article was written on July 20 2010)
This blog entry is for all the people that would like to silence Julian Assange and his wikileaks. It is the secret hint to not only silence Assange but possibly destroy wikileaks completely with a very simple, yet unimaginable effective move. Now – my hint is so elegant that some of you might doubt it at first or feel as if beeing not taken seriously, but... nothing could be farther from the truth! Let it sink in, think about it and then ask yourself: is it true? Is it doable? If both answers should be yes, then it's your decision to act upon it or to choose consciously to not act upon it for whatever reason.
Furthermore: following my proposal could in addition have the effect that you get unprecedented political and or social power. A lot of power. And quick. Quicker than you ever thought. But remember: with power comes also responsibility. And using a hint successfully before paying the one that gave it to you should defenitely humble you.
Ready? Here we go...
What is it, that makes Wikileaks so vigorous? An Analysis.
First let's inquire, what it is, that makes Wikileaks such a powerful movement. And why this might be threatening the one or the other. So, what are Wikileaks most powerful weapons? First and foremost it is truthfulness. They try to their best extend to have at any time, in any place the - for a human beeing - highest possible grade of truthfulness. Combined with high social values and trustworthiness this is a very strong weapon, as nobody can change what is right now, right here, already true. You cannot make it anymore untrue as it is already true and in the next moment it is too late to make untrue what was true a moment before. And people know that. They know, that something in a given moment now or in the past is or was true. Even if the same thing or opinion or state should not be true anymore in the future. People – you and me – feel it, with an instinct like animals. And to most people on this planet, truthfullness is something good. Something sexy. Something to be wanted. Something to be searched for. Something extremely valuable.
But thats not enough. Truth is a fragile good, so you need to secure the space to deliver it. That's what Wikileaks does. «Why?» you ask me? Well, because they want to. And more importantly because they can! Because they have the power to just do it. So thats the second main weapon of Wikileaks: they have the tools to secure certain spaces to let truth be seen. This space is mainly the internet. And as they have one space where they can keep it openly and safely to be seen for everybody, they get another weapon for free: they can talk about it in real life («real life» as in contrast to «virtual life» / «internet» / «cyberspace»). And everybody can independently check the proof in the virtual world for him- / herself.
But why does this work so well? What are the mechanics behind it? There are several mechanics behind it, here is one of the most important: The number of people, who want to keep really important things classified is very small. We are talking about really important things here. Not about those people, that want to keep it a secret, that they still pick their nose. But people, that keep things a secret, that concern a lot of people, folks, countries or even humanity as a whole. So there is a small number of interests to keep important things secret and a huge number of interests, that want to uncover those secrets and therefore cover Wikileaks back.
What are possible strategies to defeat Wikileaks?
And here begins my (reverse engineering) strategy. I will give you in the next lines the knowledge and tools to defeat Julian Assange and if a big enough number of people follow it, it might be strong enough to take Wikileaks down. To completely destroy it. Here we go:
So, this is the situation: you have a strong opponent in front of you, with strong weapons and a huge network of people supporting him. What are strategies to disempower him? As every excellent samurai knows, there are several: a) your weapons have to become stronger than your opponents weapons (including the skills to handle them), b) in addition you can try to disarm your opponent, c) and or you either look for an even bigger amount of people to support you or you convince more than fifty percent of your opponents followers to change sides to yours or you persuade them to not support your opponent anymore so that your own followers group grows bigger relatively to your opponent's one and or d) you get out of the reach of your opponent by either physically or mentally leaving the space your opponent occupies or – in the most extreme samurai worst case – by killing your opponent or yourself. No more opponent, no more threat. Last but not least there is another solution, a sweeping one, an sovereign one, an elegant and genius one, that I will introduce you to...
Now lets analyze how this knowledge could effect Wikileaks and Julian Assange. At the same time, this analysis gives us a more complete understanding why Wikileaks / Assanges weapons and strategies are so powerful... But we can learn from that and use it for ourselves…
A quick look shows us, that some of the above mentioned «disempowering strategies» are near to impossible to implement: dying – I suppose – is not an option.
The internet, as we use it today, is mainly one space. Moving out of that space is also not an option because it is an too important daily tool and would weaken our action radius dramatically and at the same time not stopping Wikileaks to spread the information to people close to us, that we are confronted with on a daily basis.
Physically avoiding Wikileaks doesn't do the trick either, because it is not their physicality, that is threatening but unphysical information that is made public and then spread over the whole planet by Wikileaks. Stopping them from spreading this information is a near to impossible job either because they are the kings in virtual space: they are the superhackers and to gather the people and the knowledge to support us would take years and years and too much energy... especially because their supporter group grows very fast and would be always bigger than ours.
Taking down the physical stations as holders of their virtual space would be the first thing seemingly in reach but – on close examination – wouldn't work either because of several reasons: we would have to take all physical servers down. Only one server working will continue feeding their product, classified information, into the net. In addition the server locations are probably dozens and kept secret. And even if we found them, there would be legislative burdens because of the different countries jurisdictions. In addition Wikileaks would connect new, hidden servers to the net at the speed of our finding them and taking them down. So: also not an option.
Which leads us to more dramatic moves: Taking the Wikileaks people physically out. This seems on first sight a stategy that could be put into practice. But there are some serious problems with that strategy: Julian Assange and his crew seem to be not too stupid, or, to put it in other words: quite clever. So they must have taken that option into consideration at least before publishing their «collateral murder»-video. Which makes this an very uncontrolled, uncontrollable plan. Wikileak-Members could for example have doubles representing them in public like presidents and actors have, too. It might even be possible that Julian Assange is not the head of the group but somebody completely unknown. How to find out if that is the case? And who exactly belongs to Wikileaks and who doesn't? Would it be enough to «permanently incapacitate» only one or two members of Wikileaks? Maybe. Maybe not! And if the first are incapacitated what would guarantee us, that Wikileaks hasn't held back the really, totally, shocking classified information that would transform citizens into a uncontrollable mob hunting you and your followers down? We see: a very risky, inelegant solution with the risk of far more damage than real solution. Which means: no good idea. Which means: no option either.
What is left of our strategy ideas? To increase your group of followers versus theirs? And yet again: the chance of success with this one is small. Very small. Why? As I said, because there are a lot, I mean a lot of people that want Assange to continue publishing, that are concerned about those classifieds, that desire full truth in contrast to the few that want those information kept secret. And as long as Wikileaks does nothing illegal or something that heavily threatens the security of us all, it would be hard to outnumber their supporters.
Which leaves us with strategies a) your weapons have to become stronger than your opponents weapons (including the skills to handle them) and b) in addition you can try to disarm your opponent. In fact, those two are the only realistic options to achieve our goal to combat and or silence Wikileaks.
Can Wikileaks be disarmed?
Let's start with the second one: disarming our opponent. This could be done in four different ways: For example: 1) prevent their (potential) sources from giving them any further sourcematerial, 2) taking all source material away from them, 3) identifying and propagandizing their wrong or flawed sources and or source material, 4) tricking them into publishing wrong or flawed source material and then propagandizing their wrong or flawed sources and or source material.
Let's have a look at those points one at a time:
2) Taking all source material away from them. It is not opinions or personal texts that Wikileaks publishes but usually copies (in text or image) of hard proof in form of hard copy or digital data never created by them themselves but leaked by insiders in the know. This info then is immediately spread not only on their servers but a big part of the internet communities servers as well. And as stated earlier: everybody understanding a little of information technology knows: what once was in the internet stays in the internet forever.
Additionally a combat within the internet is not really an option because they, Assange and Co., are the experts in that field, invincible it seems, so it would probably be very hard to hack their website – and all their friend's websites, too, of course – to take down all their publications as well as hindering them to publish them anew… There's also the danger, that an even more loosely organized network starts to republish the sources and thus publication gets even more decentralized than it is anyhow already.
3) Identifying and propagandizing their wrong or flawed sources and or source material. I'm sure this has been tried already. And I'm pretty positive, that Assange has seen that coming and has made damn sure all the published material is checked and double checked and nailed down very thoroughly. Airtight, so to speak.
4) Tricking them into publishing wrong or flawed source material and then propagandizing their wrong or flawed sources and or source material. This should be not so easy. Exactly because it is an obvious attack against the credibility of the WL-project and Assange most probably is very aware of that and will, as I said before, check and double check the material. I don't know how far they just check the documents / information / data leaked on their originality and how far they check the context in which they've been produced. So one possible attack could be to produce data in a very complex situation, then leak the data and some information which is on one hand true and verifiable but on the other gives a completely wrong picture about the data and it's source. Then let them publish it with the only very limited available information of the context. And reveal later the complete context of how the data occurred changing the complete picture of the whole thing. This would definitely harm Wikileaks but I very much doubt, that it would be a deadly strike for them…
So, what's really working then?
Which leaves us with our last option: weapons that are stronger than your opponents weapons. The problem with this one is: there doesn't exist something like «less true». Either something (idea, information, happening, theorie…) is true or it is untrue. Yes, there are different perspectives but it is very rare that something is true and untrue at the same time. And knowledge, insight and truth, sought and valued by so many people on this planet is a very powerful weapon. Probably one of the most powerful if not the most powerful. The very few more powerful ones could include something like the control over planetwide powers as: the power to kill all humanity, the power to control weather planetwide or important knowledge like the forseeing of when and where natural disasters will occur or the power to save all humanity from a disease or the power to take absolute control over the whole internet for an extended time etc. But most if not all of those powers are out of the average human beings reach.
This inevitably leads us to one preferred choice: using the same weapon as Assange and Wikileaks which could look like this:
1. First we cut their potential source material down by becoming totally transparent and by not producing any more secret data. Furthermore we start to make all secret data that we accumulated so far transparent or destroy it discretely. This lowers our own profile that could be attacked or be revealed by a leaker to zero.
2. Creating a save environment for data leaks to give Wikileaks some serious competition. Thus the focus gets shifted at least a little away from Wikileaks and some of its power shifts to you.
3. Start publishing more frequently and more relevant data than Wikileaks. As the Wikileak experiment shows there is a lot of people feeling urged to come out with the truth. Wikileaks is overloaded. This is one of Wikileaks weaknesses.
4. Get hold of a widespread medium like a big television channel and or a big newspaper and start publishing your material in a way that can be understood and estimated by the public. A lot of Wikileaks' data is too complex for the average citizen. That is another weak spot of Wikileaks to exploit. Also start to not only publish single, isolated data sources but show the deeper lines and connections to your readers and followers. How things fit together. The big picture so to speak. Create a Medium which can be consumed every day in about 20 minutes but reads in a way that is more captivating than all Steven King stories together, more deep than all philosopher's knowledge accumulated, that is more relevant to each citizen than anything he/she has stumbled upon in his/her entire life. And publish that material in an for everybody easily understandable form. Yes, this is possible. Make Wikileaks look like kids stuff compared to yours. Make WL publishings look like unimportant, boring chatter aside of your stories. Make Wikileaks history.
Roger Le Marié, 20 July 2010
This blog entry is for all the people that would like to silence Julian Assange and his wikileaks. It is the secret hint to not only silence Assange but possibly destroy wikileaks completely with a very simple, yet unimaginable effective move. Now – my hint is so elegant that some of you might doubt it at first or feel as if beeing not taken seriously, but... nothing could be farther from the truth! Let it sink in, think about it and then ask yourself: is it true? Is it doable? If both answers should be yes, then it's your decision to act upon it or to choose consciously to not act upon it for whatever reason.
Furthermore: following my proposal could in addition have the effect that you get unprecedented political and or social power. A lot of power. And quick. Quicker than you ever thought. But remember: with power comes also responsibility. And using a hint successfully before paying the one that gave it to you should defenitely humble you.
Ready? Here we go...
What is it, that makes Wikileaks so vigorous? An Analysis.
First let's inquire, what it is, that makes Wikileaks such a powerful movement. And why this might be threatening the one or the other. So, what are Wikileaks most powerful weapons? First and foremost it is truthfulness. They try to their best extend to have at any time, in any place the - for a human beeing - highest possible grade of truthfulness. Combined with high social values and trustworthiness this is a very strong weapon, as nobody can change what is right now, right here, already true. You cannot make it anymore untrue as it is already true and in the next moment it is too late to make untrue what was true a moment before. And people know that. They know, that something in a given moment now or in the past is or was true. Even if the same thing or opinion or state should not be true anymore in the future. People – you and me – feel it, with an instinct like animals. And to most people on this planet, truthfullness is something good. Something sexy. Something to be wanted. Something to be searched for. Something extremely valuable.
But thats not enough. Truth is a fragile good, so you need to secure the space to deliver it. That's what Wikileaks does. «Why?» you ask me? Well, because they want to. And more importantly because they can! Because they have the power to just do it. So thats the second main weapon of Wikileaks: they have the tools to secure certain spaces to let truth be seen. This space is mainly the internet. And as they have one space where they can keep it openly and safely to be seen for everybody, they get another weapon for free: they can talk about it in real life («real life» as in contrast to «virtual life» / «internet» / «cyberspace»). And everybody can independently check the proof in the virtual world for him- / herself.
But why does this work so well? What are the mechanics behind it? There are several mechanics behind it, here is one of the most important: The number of people, who want to keep really important things classified is very small. We are talking about really important things here. Not about those people, that want to keep it a secret, that they still pick their nose. But people, that keep things a secret, that concern a lot of people, folks, countries or even humanity as a whole. So there is a small number of interests to keep important things secret and a huge number of interests, that want to uncover those secrets and therefore cover Wikileaks back.
What are possible strategies to defeat Wikileaks?
And here begins my (reverse engineering) strategy. I will give you in the next lines the knowledge and tools to defeat Julian Assange and if a big enough number of people follow it, it might be strong enough to take Wikileaks down. To completely destroy it. Here we go:
So, this is the situation: you have a strong opponent in front of you, with strong weapons and a huge network of people supporting him. What are strategies to disempower him? As every excellent samurai knows, there are several: a) your weapons have to become stronger than your opponents weapons (including the skills to handle them), b) in addition you can try to disarm your opponent, c) and or you either look for an even bigger amount of people to support you or you convince more than fifty percent of your opponents followers to change sides to yours or you persuade them to not support your opponent anymore so that your own followers group grows bigger relatively to your opponent's one and or d) you get out of the reach of your opponent by either physically or mentally leaving the space your opponent occupies or – in the most extreme samurai worst case – by killing your opponent or yourself. No more opponent, no more threat. Last but not least there is another solution, a sweeping one, an sovereign one, an elegant and genius one, that I will introduce you to...
Now lets analyze how this knowledge could effect Wikileaks and Julian Assange. At the same time, this analysis gives us a more complete understanding why Wikileaks / Assanges weapons and strategies are so powerful... But we can learn from that and use it for ourselves…
A quick look shows us, that some of the above mentioned «disempowering strategies» are near to impossible to implement: dying – I suppose – is not an option.
The internet, as we use it today, is mainly one space. Moving out of that space is also not an option because it is an too important daily tool and would weaken our action radius dramatically and at the same time not stopping Wikileaks to spread the information to people close to us, that we are confronted with on a daily basis.
Physically avoiding Wikileaks doesn't do the trick either, because it is not their physicality, that is threatening but unphysical information that is made public and then spread over the whole planet by Wikileaks. Stopping them from spreading this information is a near to impossible job either because they are the kings in virtual space: they are the superhackers and to gather the people and the knowledge to support us would take years and years and too much energy... especially because their supporter group grows very fast and would be always bigger than ours.
Taking down the physical stations as holders of their virtual space would be the first thing seemingly in reach but – on close examination – wouldn't work either because of several reasons: we would have to take all physical servers down. Only one server working will continue feeding their product, classified information, into the net. In addition the server locations are probably dozens and kept secret. And even if we found them, there would be legislative burdens because of the different countries jurisdictions. In addition Wikileaks would connect new, hidden servers to the net at the speed of our finding them and taking them down. So: also not an option.
Which leads us to more dramatic moves: Taking the Wikileaks people physically out. This seems on first sight a stategy that could be put into practice. But there are some serious problems with that strategy: Julian Assange and his crew seem to be not too stupid, or, to put it in other words: quite clever. So they must have taken that option into consideration at least before publishing their «collateral murder»-video. Which makes this an very uncontrolled, uncontrollable plan. Wikileak-Members could for example have doubles representing them in public like presidents and actors have, too. It might even be possible that Julian Assange is not the head of the group but somebody completely unknown. How to find out if that is the case? And who exactly belongs to Wikileaks and who doesn't? Would it be enough to «permanently incapacitate» only one or two members of Wikileaks? Maybe. Maybe not! And if the first are incapacitated what would guarantee us, that Wikileaks hasn't held back the really, totally, shocking classified information that would transform citizens into a uncontrollable mob hunting you and your followers down? We see: a very risky, inelegant solution with the risk of far more damage than real solution. Which means: no good idea. Which means: no option either.
What is left of our strategy ideas? To increase your group of followers versus theirs? And yet again: the chance of success with this one is small. Very small. Why? As I said, because there are a lot, I mean a lot of people that want Assange to continue publishing, that are concerned about those classifieds, that desire full truth in contrast to the few that want those information kept secret. And as long as Wikileaks does nothing illegal or something that heavily threatens the security of us all, it would be hard to outnumber their supporters.
Which leaves us with strategies a) your weapons have to become stronger than your opponents weapons (including the skills to handle them) and b) in addition you can try to disarm your opponent. In fact, those two are the only realistic options to achieve our goal to combat and or silence Wikileaks.
Can Wikileaks be disarmed?
Let's start with the second one: disarming our opponent. This could be done in four different ways: For example: 1) prevent their (potential) sources from giving them any further sourcematerial, 2) taking all source material away from them, 3) identifying and propagandizing their wrong or flawed sources and or source material, 4) tricking them into publishing wrong or flawed source material and then propagandizing their wrong or flawed sources and or source material.
Let's have a look at those points one at a time:
1) Prevent their (potential) sources from giving them any further source material. This one could include to threaten (potential) sources or to keep sources involved in leaking classified information at a absolute minimum of maybe three persons in the know so you could investigate and hunt down a leaker. But the reality of complex information and systems often doesn't allow to keep sources at a minimum of three involved persons… And a part of Wikileak's strategy was and is to protect their sources with which they seem to have been very successful so far. Often they probably even don't know their sources. So it would probably be very hard to unveil and proove the true identity of a source and punish that source as a threat to other possible leakers. Also the ways of submitting leaks are far too many and far too diverse (digital, online, offline, hard copy, by snailmail, personally given …) to control all the channels for possible leaks.
Additionally a combat within the internet is not really an option because they, Assange and Co., are the experts in that field, invincible it seems, so it would probably be very hard to hack their website – and all their friend's websites, too, of course – to take down all their publications as well as hindering them to publish them anew… There's also the danger, that an even more loosely organized network starts to republish the sources and thus publication gets even more decentralized than it is anyhow already.
3) Identifying and propagandizing their wrong or flawed sources and or source material. I'm sure this has been tried already. And I'm pretty positive, that Assange has seen that coming and has made damn sure all the published material is checked and double checked and nailed down very thoroughly. Airtight, so to speak.
4) Tricking them into publishing wrong or flawed source material and then propagandizing their wrong or flawed sources and or source material. This should be not so easy. Exactly because it is an obvious attack against the credibility of the WL-project and Assange most probably is very aware of that and will, as I said before, check and double check the material. I don't know how far they just check the documents / information / data leaked on their originality and how far they check the context in which they've been produced. So one possible attack could be to produce data in a very complex situation, then leak the data and some information which is on one hand true and verifiable but on the other gives a completely wrong picture about the data and it's source. Then let them publish it with the only very limited available information of the context. And reveal later the complete context of how the data occurred changing the complete picture of the whole thing. This would definitely harm Wikileaks but I very much doubt, that it would be a deadly strike for them…
So, what's really working then?
Which leaves us with our last option: weapons that are stronger than your opponents weapons. The problem with this one is: there doesn't exist something like «less true». Either something (idea, information, happening, theorie…) is true or it is untrue. Yes, there are different perspectives but it is very rare that something is true and untrue at the same time. And knowledge, insight and truth, sought and valued by so many people on this planet is a very powerful weapon. Probably one of the most powerful if not the most powerful. The very few more powerful ones could include something like the control over planetwide powers as: the power to kill all humanity, the power to control weather planetwide or important knowledge like the forseeing of when and where natural disasters will occur or the power to save all humanity from a disease or the power to take absolute control over the whole internet for an extended time etc. But most if not all of those powers are out of the average human beings reach.
This inevitably leads us to one preferred choice: using the same weapon as Assange and Wikileaks which could look like this:
1. First we cut their potential source material down by becoming totally transparent and by not producing any more secret data. Furthermore we start to make all secret data that we accumulated so far transparent or destroy it discretely. This lowers our own profile that could be attacked or be revealed by a leaker to zero.
2. Creating a save environment for data leaks to give Wikileaks some serious competition. Thus the focus gets shifted at least a little away from Wikileaks and some of its power shifts to you.
3. Start publishing more frequently and more relevant data than Wikileaks. As the Wikileak experiment shows there is a lot of people feeling urged to come out with the truth. Wikileaks is overloaded. This is one of Wikileaks weaknesses.
4. Get hold of a widespread medium like a big television channel and or a big newspaper and start publishing your material in a way that can be understood and estimated by the public. A lot of Wikileaks' data is too complex for the average citizen. That is another weak spot of Wikileaks to exploit. Also start to not only publish single, isolated data sources but show the deeper lines and connections to your readers and followers. How things fit together. The big picture so to speak. Create a Medium which can be consumed every day in about 20 minutes but reads in a way that is more captivating than all Steven King stories together, more deep than all philosopher's knowledge accumulated, that is more relevant to each citizen than anything he/she has stumbled upon in his/her entire life. And publish that material in an for everybody easily understandable form. Yes, this is possible. Make Wikileaks look like kids stuff compared to yours. Make WL publishings look like unimportant, boring chatter aside of your stories. Make Wikileaks history.
Roger Le Marié, 20 July 2010
«This is my choice...»
Faithless - God Is A DJ (Official Music Video). Watch more top selected videos about: Faithless
What could I possibly wish someone with a smile giving hope like the countless stars in the nightsky and vibes of loving kindness spreading like the waves of the ocean?? So it is only for my little self, that I wish, you may continue on this journey in good health and with undaunted contentness to smile and to spread those invaluable vibrations… Thank you!
Bei diesem Video sieht man sehr schön, was man mit gutem Timing und Bewegungen (Pantomime) alles aus einem Film, bzw. dessen Charaktere herausholen kann, ohne grosse Spezialeffekte, ohne Kameraschnitt (mit Ausnahme der Kameraperspektive), ohne Gesichtsausdrücke, ohne Sprache und nur minimalem Sound. Erstaunlich!
«Hear my words all you stronghearted out there that will come true within the next 24 months: J. Assange will be awarded a nobel prize. Which one is unsure to the moment.»
(I would have loved to say this in an oldfashioned shakespear english but as my mothertongue is german... but if anyone wants to help me out you're very welcome!)
(I would have loved to say this in an oldfashioned shakespear english but as my mothertongue is german... but if anyone wants to help me out you're very welcome!)
 |
| Julian Paul Assange |
Glaube nichts, nur weil die Weisen es behaupten.
Glaube nichts, nur weil es immer schon so war.
Glaube nichts, nur weil andere es glauben.
Prüfe und erfahre alles selbst.
Buddha
Glaube nichts, nur weil es immer schon so war.
Glaube nichts, nur weil andere es glauben.
Prüfe und erfahre alles selbst.
Buddha
Architect: «…beginning and end. There are two doors. The door to your right leads to the Source, and the salvation of Zion. The door to your left leads back to the Matrix, to her and to the end of your species. As you adequately put, the problem is choice. But we already know what you are going to do, don't we? Already, I can see the chain reaction…»
Da der Architekt selber ein Programm ist, fehlt ihm der grössere Kontext, den Neo hat. Was Neo nicht verändern kann ist, dass sich etwas grosses, wichtiges verändert. Egal welche Türe er wählt. Es wird einen Neustart in der einen oder anderen Art geben. Was der Architekt nicht weiss, da ihm der grössere Zusammenhang eben fehlt: er gibt Neo selber den Schlüssel für die Lösung. Der vermeintliche Tod der gesamten Menschheit bedeutet nämlich auch den Tod der Maschinen, da diese auf die Menschen als Energielieferanten angewiesen sind. Und da die Maschinen selber überleben wollen erzwingt Neo durch seine Wahl somit einen Deal, wie auch immer der aussehen wird...
Die Schweiz braucht einen Neustart
Unsere Art des Zusammenlebens und Wirtschaftens ist weltweit und auch in unserem Land in eine Sackgasse geraten. Unsere so genannte Wirtschaft enthüllt sich immer mehr als ein blosses Instrument einer verschwindend kleinen globalen Oligarchie, die ihre Profite um jeden Preis aufrechterhalten will (15 Prozent der Weltbevölkerung besitzen 85 Prozent des Weltvermögens). Zu diesem Zweck werden wir mit gegenseitiger Konkurrenzierung, Arbeitsstress, Anonymisierung und Isolation daran gehindert, einen globalen Haushalt aufzubauen, der allen ein gerechtes und gutes Leben ermöglicht. Nicht nur funktioniert diese oligarchische Wirtschaftsweise nicht, sie zerstört auch die sozialen und ökologischen Grundlagen unseres Planeten.
Ein Ausweg aus der ökologischen und sozialen Sackgasse kann nicht mit ein paar technologischen Tricks gefunden werden. Es gibt in absehbarer Zukunft keine nachhaltigen Energiequellen, die das heutige Verbrauchsniveau aufrechterhalten können. Wir müssen also daran gehen, eine... (read more)
Artikel als PDF
Da der Architekt selber ein Programm ist, fehlt ihm der grössere Kontext, den Neo hat. Was Neo nicht verändern kann ist, dass sich etwas grosses, wichtiges verändert. Egal welche Türe er wählt. Es wird einen Neustart in der einen oder anderen Art geben. Was der Architekt nicht weiss, da ihm der grössere Zusammenhang eben fehlt: er gibt Neo selber den Schlüssel für die Lösung. Der vermeintliche Tod der gesamten Menschheit bedeutet nämlich auch den Tod der Maschinen, da diese auf die Menschen als Energielieferanten angewiesen sind. Und da die Maschinen selber überleben wollen erzwingt Neo durch seine Wahl somit einen Deal, wie auch immer der aussehen wird...
Die Schweiz braucht einen Neustart
Unsere Art des Zusammenlebens und Wirtschaftens ist weltweit und auch in unserem Land in eine Sackgasse geraten. Unsere so genannte Wirtschaft enthüllt sich immer mehr als ein blosses Instrument einer verschwindend kleinen globalen Oligarchie, die ihre Profite um jeden Preis aufrechterhalten will (15 Prozent der Weltbevölkerung besitzen 85 Prozent des Weltvermögens). Zu diesem Zweck werden wir mit gegenseitiger Konkurrenzierung, Arbeitsstress, Anonymisierung und Isolation daran gehindert, einen globalen Haushalt aufzubauen, der allen ein gerechtes und gutes Leben ermöglicht. Nicht nur funktioniert diese oligarchische Wirtschaftsweise nicht, sie zerstört auch die sozialen und ökologischen Grundlagen unseres Planeten.
Ein Ausweg aus der ökologischen und sozialen Sackgasse kann nicht mit ein paar technologischen Tricks gefunden werden. Es gibt in absehbarer Zukunft keine nachhaltigen Energiequellen, die das heutige Verbrauchsniveau aufrechterhalten können. Wir müssen also daran gehen, eine... (read more)
Artikel als PDF
To all women that do not want to repeat themselves over and over again.
And to all men confusing imagination with reality.
Click here: xxx
And to all men confusing imagination with reality.
Click here: xxx
«Anyone who trades liberty for security deserves neither liberty nor security»
Benjamin Franklin
To download MacHacks Security Manual click here.Security and Privacy are inextricably linked. If you lose one you ultimately forfeit the other.
Private, anonymous communications have an important place in our political and social discourse. In the United States the Supreme Court ruled repeatedly that the right to anonymous free speech is protected by the First Amendment.
Protections for anonymous speech are vital to democratic discourse. Allowing dissenters to shield their identities frees them to express critical, minority views.
These days personal data is aggregated feverishly by both private and public sectors and yet laws pertaining to the buying, selling, storage and use of this information have yet to be properly legislated.
We must take it upon ourselves to better protect our privacy and security and raise the awareness of those around us. This manual was written with that in mind.
doz London, England December 8th 2007 www.machacks.tv
Actually the last few blog entries build a big paradox: they try to help the ego understand and start killing itself. But who would ever kill him-, her- or itself of one's free will? Nobody; nothing. We all WANT to exist. We don't want to die. This also counts for ego. So even though these blog entries maybe help to understand reality, we just nod with our heads but that's it. Why should my own ego help to work out its own death? It doesn't! So all those films, talks, ideas, concepts may bring us on one hand closer to the truth and AT THE SAME TIME, teach my ego to understand – and thus avoid! – the strategies planning to de(con)struct itself. So, material teaching an (probably very wise and deep) understanding of reality as a dreamlike state but at the same time cementing and strengthening the attachment to the dream.
Maybe it's not about understanding more deeply something that is there, but letting go of something we believe in that in first place never really was there? Maybe it's not adding but subtracting something?
You find this disturbing? Well, I do find this all quite disturbing. I'm, so to speak, disturbing my self ;)
Well, at least Osho didn't see anything wrong in that. In contrary, I love in what humorous way he speaks of shattering peoples beliefs to the core...
Maybe it's not about understanding more deeply something that is there, but letting go of something we believe in that in first place never really was there? Maybe it's not adding but subtracting something?
You find this disturbing? Well, I do find this all quite disturbing. I'm, so to speak, disturbing my self ;)
Well, at least Osho didn't see anything wrong in that. In contrary, I love in what humorous way he speaks of shattering peoples beliefs to the core...
Icewaterpictures goes on:
«friend said that non dual cannot feel loneliness.... from what I am imagining, and it could just be imagination, in the nondual, there IS such thing as 'alone' or 'loneliness' - that is to say if - from a logic perspective - if you are the thought that created matter (or the thought that arose simultaneious to matter), that sentence, that thought is - I am. So the natural result would be "anybody else?"»
Taken from Office Works. A website by the Future Media Architects, inc (FMA)
If you could have any job? from Officeworks on Vimeo.
If you could have any job? from Officeworks on Vimeo.
Wieso sie gewann? Es war nicht der seichte Songtext, sondern die Authentizität und Natürlichkeit von Lena. Lovely!
Die Lippen kleiner geschminkt als sie sind, die Zähne nicht unnatürlich Schneeweiss...
Die Lippen kleiner geschminkt als sie sind, die Zähne nicht unnatürlich Schneeweiss...
Video of an Aljazeera Activist reporting live found on Aljazeera's website.
2. Die Antwort
Da sag ich nur: stand strong.
Kulturschaffende und Gebildete,
nehmt eure Verantwortung wahr,
wie es alle Intellektuellen vor
Euch getan haben. Intellekt ist
sexy (und 'Intellektueller' eine
Achtungsbezeichnung, nicht ein
Schimpfwort, wie es gewisse Leute
gerne hätten.) Intellekt ist, was uns
vom Tier unterscheidet!
People Power is the new force!
Check out and inform Avaaz.org
Be the change u want to see.
Respektvoll,
Roger
(danke Spitta für das Mail)
1. Das Mail von Juliane (Stuttgarter Galeristin)
Liebe Freunde unserer Arbeit,
heute Morgen fand ich mein Postfach überschwemmt mit Nachrichten von dem tödlichen Angriff auf die Flotille, die Hilfsgüter nach Gaza bringen wollte. Was für ein Schock. Die üblichen Medien berichten in der üblichen eher verwirrenden Weise.
In den israelischen Medien wird von bislang etwa 19 Toten gesprochen. Noch weiß niemand genaue Zahlen noch wer sich darunter befindet. Vielleicht deutsche Bundestagsabgeordnete? Andere internationale Politiker? Oder Henning Mankell? Die irische Friedensnobelpreisträgerin Mairead Maguire?
Für diejenigen, die sich besser aufklären wollen:
http://www.freegaza.de/aktuelles.phpDie deutsche Free Gaza Organisation hat ein Schiff mit medizinischen Hilfsgütern geschickt. Auf der Seite findet man recht übersichtlich Informationen, die den Geist der Bewegung deutlich machen.
Hier noch ein kleines Video über das Rachel Corrie Schiff aus Irland:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YjyurMgrQu0&feature=relatedUnd hier die beste Presserklärung, die mir heute zugesandt wurde, sie ist von der internationalen Liga für Menschenrechte:
P R E S S E E R K L Ä R U N G
Die Internationale Liga für Menschenrechte protestiert gegen den todbringenden Piratenakt der israelischen Streitkräfte gegen die Schiffe der Free Gaza Flotille!
Die Liga fordert die Bundesregierung auf, von der israelischen Regierung ultimativ den sofortigen Zugang zu den gekidnappten deutschen Delegationsmitgliedern zu erwirken – in Absprache mit den anderen Regierungen, deren Bürgerinnen und Bürger von den israelischen Behörden entführt wurden.
Wir erwarten eine klare Verurteilung des rechtswidrigen Vorgehens der israelischen Behörden durch die Bundesregierung und halten es für unbedingt notwendig, dass die deutsche Regierung endlich öffentlich ein Ende der israelischen Blockade des Gazastreifens fordert!
Die Mission der Free Gaza Flotille war und bleibt unmissverständlich: Die Zivilgesellschaften vieler Nationen auf allen Kontinenten sind nicht länger bereit, tatenlos hinzunehmen, dass der israelischen Regierung die systematische Abriegelung und Erdrosselung der Bevölkerung von Gaza gestattet bleibt.
Israel steht nicht über dem internationalen Recht. Die Interessen seiner Bevölkerung haben keinen höheren Rang als das Gebot der Menschlichkeit und die Verpflichtung zur Einhaltung der universellen Menschenrechte, die von der internationale Staatengemeinschaft jedem Menschen, ungeachtet der Nationalität, des Glaubens und der ethnischen Herkunft zugesichert sind.
Wir wissen nicht, worüber wir zuerst entsetzt sein sollen:
darüber, dass Menschen, die Hilfsgüter für die palästinensische Bevölkerung nach Gaza bringen wollten, getötet und verletzt wurden,
darüber, dass die israelischen Streitkräfte den 6 Schiffen grundsätzlich den Weg nach Gaza versperrt haben und dass sie einen Hilfskonvoi mit Zivilistinnen und Zivilisten überhaupt angegriffen haben,
darüber, dass sich die israelische Regierung einseitige Kontrollrechte anmaßt über Güter, die überhaupt nur gebracht werden müssen, weil die israelische Regeierung selbst verhindert, dass die Bevölkerung des Gazastreifens damit ausreichend versorgt wird,
darüber, dass der Angriff in internationalen Gewässern erfolgte,
darüber, dass dieser Angriff in den frühen Morgenstunden unternommen wurde, nachdem die Schiffe bereits gegen 23:00 Uhr gestern bedrängt wurden und daraufhin beschlossen, die von Israel willkürlich definierte Schutzzone zunächst zu meiden,
darüber also, dass sie für ihre Vorsicht durch den Angriff zusätzlich „bestraft“ wurden,
darüber, dass die israelische Regierung noch gestern Abend willkürlich ihre „Schutzzone“ ausdehnte, (um dann doch ihren todbringenden Piratenakt außerhalb sogar dieser Zone zu begehen),
darüber, dass sie einerseits behauptet, den Gazastreifen nicht mehr zu besetzen, andererseits aber einseitig Souveränitätsrechte vor dem Hoheitsgebiet des Gazastreifens beansprucht,
darüber, dass die israelische Regierung im Vorfeld ihres Gewaltaktes falsche Behauptungen über die Organisatoren des Hilfskonvois verbreitete – offenbar, um die Militäraktion im Vorfeld propagandistisch abzusichern. Beispielsweise wurde verbreitet, dass die Vertreter von „Free Gaza“ sich geweigert hätten, eine Nachricht für den gefangenen israelischen Soldaten Gilat Schalit mitzunehmen und sich für ihn zu verwenden. Tatsächlich erklärten sich irische Vertreter dazu bereit, wurden dann aber nicht mehr über die gewünschten Einzelheiten informiert,
darüber, dass die israelische Regierung jetzt meint, sie könne die gekidnappten Helferinen und Helfer wie Kriminelle behandeln, müsse weiter von der eigenen Verantwortung ablenken und sei befugt, „Nachrichtensperren“ zu verhängen
oder darüber, dass die israelische Regierung den Gazastreifen zum größten Freiluft-gefängnis der Welt ausgebaut hat und es den Menschen dort nicht einmal ermöglicht wird, die Schäden des Gazakrieges zu beseitigen, der von der israelischen Regierung initiiert wurde. (In dem von der UNO in Auftrag gegebenen „Goldstone-Report“ wird Israel und der Hamas Kriegsverbrechen vorgeworfen.)
(Mit der Bitte um Kenntnisnahme und Berichterstattung
Für Rückfragen wenden Sie sich bitte an:
Martin Forberg, Mobil: 0151-177 900 94)
Wer sich eingehender mit dem Nahostkonflikt befassen möchte und diesbezüglich Literaurempfehlungen und/oder Filmtipps wünscht, kann sich gerne jederzeit an mich wenden.
Mit herzlichen Grüßen
Juliane Spitta
In this short video James Randi explains homeopathy. This is a portion of the lecture Randi gave at Princeton in 2001. The full video is here: http://www.rationalresponders.com/jam...
Sohn Tommy - das schwarze Schaf in der Familie - passt nach seinem Gefängnisaufenthalt auf die Familie seines Bruders auf, der in Afghanistan in Taliban-Gefangenschaft gerät. Ich glaube, dieser Anti-Kriegsfilm ist meines Erachtens realitätsnaher als es alle, Regisseur, Darsteller, Publikum, eigentlich wollten...
Wenn ihr wissen wollt wie Krieg ist, watch:
Wenn ihr wissen wollt wie Krieg ist, watch:
Farbenrausch
Im Gellertdreieck strahlt sein
letzter Sieg
_/|\_
RIP Dare Gellert Action by Dream Rusl Desm Doom (© joelsames.ch)
*
Ich habe Dare 1986 im City Disc in der Steinenvorstadt in Basel kennengelernt, wo er zu dieser Zeit noch arbeitete.
Rest in Peace Dare † 06.03.2010 from I Love Graffiti on Vimeo.
Gestern Abend ist Dare (*1968) von uns gegangen. Er erlag seinem Krebsleiden und starb am Abend des 6. März 2010 in einem Spital in Basel.
Wir vermissen dich, Dare, und du wirst in uns noch lange nachklingen, wenn deine Bilder in wildem Rausch an unserem Zugfenster vorbeiziehen…
*
«[…] und wenn man daran glaubt, dass Handschrift Ausdruck von Persönlichkeit ist, so kann in jedem einzelnen Buchstaben Leben gefunden werden. Dieses Leben wiederum, bin ich. DARE! oder Sigi von Koeding.»
Sigi von Koeding / Dare
*
Weitere Tribute pages unter:
http://www.ilovegraffiti.de/eng/2010/03/07/in-memory-of-dare/
http://joelsames.ch/news/
http://dabakerynyc.com/dare-r-i-p-painting-last-year-da-bakery/
http://www.marshall-art.ch/
http://diemagazin.ch/2010/03/07/r-i-p-dare/
http://streetfiles.org/photos/detail/409639/
http://www.ilovegraffiti.de/blog/2010/03/07/rest-in-peace-dare-tws/
und viele andere mehr...
*
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
«so can The All, be lonely? Well, you could say that when the I am - the non dual formulates that question, that formulation is the dropping into dualism. the I am thought exists in void, but then the All becomes the many to respond to the question, or rather the question is matter. it is both the question and the response. of course the answer is, there is nobody else, you (the I am thought) is all that there is.»